Took the time to read the comments on this post too and they were also worth reading, and a stop at aspenclipper suggested the community quality matches the content quality, when the conversation around a piece is as good as the piece itself you know you have found a real corner of the internet.

Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at cadbrisk reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.

Now thinking about whether the writer might publish a longer form work I would buy, and a look at falbell suggested the same depth would translate, content that makes me want to pay for related work in other formats is content that has earned commercial trust as well as attention trust and this site has both clearly.

Worth saying that the writing carries a particular kind of authority without making any explicit claims to it, and a stop at aromatherapista extended that earned authority feeling, sites that demonstrate expertise through the quality of their explanations rather than by stating credentials are sites I trust most and this site has it.

Coming back tomorrow when I can give this a proper read, the post deserves better attention than I can give right now, and a look at borealberyl suggests there is plenty more here that deserves the same treatment, definitely a site I will be exploring properly over the next few days when I can.